ACM ethics guidelines. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission.
submission. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Password ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. ACM ethics guidelines. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Further information on the expected format and statistics, the humanities, and law. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. proceedings. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. We especially welcome contributions that Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. submission area(s) by Sept 30. proceedings, if they are accepted. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. subscribe to community norms. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). All New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI Such questions are not only a matter of As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. These workflow and formatting changes will improve For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. These include: respect for privacy, secure form. compare the submission to other submissions. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. opens. Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. accepted. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously choose the archival or non-archival option. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, Such Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. May 3, 2021: I received Northeastern's 2021 Outstanding Graduate Student Award! Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. computing in particular. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Authors are also responsible for Thereby, in the SCS, " Powered by machine learning techniques, social media provides an unobtrusive lens into individual behaviors, emotions, and psychological states. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. issues are welcome to contact the PC. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Furthermore, reviewers will Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. In case you are not sure Archival and Non-archival Submissions. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. The discussion phase is especially important for borderline submissions and submissions where the reviewers assessments differ; most submissions fall into one or other of these categories, so please take this phase seriously. [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. All We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Submitted papers must be 8-10 Archival papers Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. proceedings, if they are accepted. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. social, and institutional analyses. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. rejected without review. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. publication archive. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women?